Workflows

What we build.

Three engagements, one method. Every workflow is built around your existing stack and protocols, every point of judgment gets a named checkpoint, and the success number is agreed before work starts.

Engagement / 01 — start here

Operations Audit

Two weeks inside your operations to find what should never reach a human desk — ranked by the hours each would return.

How it runs
  • Week one: we sit with your team and map where the hours actually go — the exports, the matching, the chasing.
  • Week two: we rank each candidate by hours returned and by risk, and sketch the checkpoints a build would need.
  • For the top candidates, we fix the measure — the number we'd agree to hit before any build starts.
What you get
  • A ranked map of the work worth automating — and the work that isn't.
  • A checkpoint sketch for each top candidate.
  • The number a build would be measured against.

If nothing is worth building, the audit says so. That's a useful answer too.

Engagement / 02

Workflow Build

We map one stuck process and ship the agent workflow that runs it — built around your stack, checkpoints named.

How it runs
  • We start from the audit, or from the one process you already know is stuck.
  • The workflow is designed around your existing tools, protocols and security guardrails — never the other way around.
  • Every point where judgment matters gets a named checkpoint: the agent drafts, your team approves.
  • It runs alongside the old way until it's earned trust. Then the old way stops.
What you get
  • The workflow, live on the tools you already run.
  • A checkpoint map you can point at.
  • A record of every run — what was drafted, who approved it, what was flagged.
  • The number, measured against what we agreed.

The success number is agreed before work starts — hours returned, exceptions caught, volume handled.

Engagement / 03

Ongoing Care

We hold the workflow after it ships — exceptions surfaced at a checkpoint, the record open, reviewed each month.

How it runs
  • Exceptions surface at a checkpoint instead of failing silently. Someone on your team decides; nothing posts twice.
  • We review the record with you each month — what ran, what was flagged, what changed.
  • When your process changes, the workflow changes with it. That's maintenance, not a new project.
What you get
  • A monthly review of the record.
  • Exception handling with a person in the loop.
  • Adjustments as your operations evolve.

A workflow you can trust is one that's still trusted a year in. That's what care is for.

Start with the work that keeps getting in the way.